Microsoft and the Future - The Way it Should be: Blog

Spaces contacts vs. Messenger contacts vs. Hotmail contacts - Not the same?

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:24:28 GMT

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but what irks me a lot is that there's different kind of contacts on Windows Live. Instead of one simple unified contact system, there's at least 3 different categories of who your contacts are : Messenger, Spaces, and Hotmail.

If you add a:

Messenger contact - You get to view them on Messenger, Spaces (if they made one), and Hotmail. Wow. It's amazing isn't it? Sometimes you might have to ask permission if they kept their Spaces private for whatever reason, even if you are a Messenger friend.

Spaces contact - You only see them on Spaces. That's it. You have the option to add as a Messenger friend, from their Space, or you could ask yourself for their real e-mail address. Least friendly place to add a contact.

Hotmail contact - You can see them on Hotmail, Messenger (if it's a Windows Live or Yahoo! account), and Spaces (if they made one).

So the best places to add a contact is directly from Live Messenger, and you want to avoid making contacts from Live Spaces. Funny, considering Live Spaces is suppose to have a community feel to it, rather than being reclusive to make friends.

What's with the need for so many different types of contacts? If I add a person on Spaces, I expect them to instantly be in my Live contacts to have easy access via Messenger and Hotmail. Not the opposite of "easy access". I wouldn't add somebody if I didn't think they were worth of communicating on more private areas like Messenger and Hotmail.

I can understand the distinction between Hotmail contacts vs. Spaces+Messenger contacts, because not all your Hotmail contacts will actually use a Windows Live account. But Spaces and Messenger friends should automatically be paired up. NO sense in not doing so.

Jamie wrote a great article about Live Contacts and what needed fixing, with a good number of issues relating to Spaces vs. Messenger contacts.

25 must-need changes to Live Spaces

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:12:33 GMT

Live Spaces is heralded as Windows Live's community site. However, it's definitely not a good community site. More or less, your "Space" is considered your own little world, and by chance, you might have a few friends who set up a Space and share and post items. Some community. Searching for a real-life friend is a joke, especially if you're an American. Or any other nationality. They're either in your contact list from the start, or you're very least likely to stumble upon anyone else you'd possibly know on Live Spaces. Oh, there might be some people that will add you, but they're honestly NOT the type of person you might consider a friend. If you consider a "friend" on Live Space to be someone who adds you to make their "friend" list larger, uses their Live Space as an advertising spam page, speaks shoddy English and has a Space in completely foreign language, doesn't even let you view their Space despite the fact they added you, or has absolutely nothing posted on their space, but a bunch of so-called "friends", than Live Space is the perfect spot to find all these people.

MUST-NEED CHANGES AND NEW FEATURES

So what else is there to offer? Well you can install "gadgets" on your Space to view a feed or enjoy a simple activity offered. But most gadgets are pure crap, and there's not a lot developers or whoever to make real interesting gadgets. You can post photos and share them. But the photo upload tool is kinda cruddy, viewing photos on Live Spaces isn't enjoyable, and a lot of photos happen to be low quality. So what's left? Blogging. Personally, blogging is probably the only decent tool, next to photo-sharing (500 photos a month, free!) that's somewhat useful on Live Spaces. I use it all the time, like to write this blog.

So pretty much, Live Spaces really sucks, despite the improvements over the years. Here's what I think could change that:

Spam killing - Live Spaces used to be a decent place to blog, but now spammers are popping up like crazy every so often. Those nasty Chinese spammers. They're quite prevalent on long-abandoned Live team blogs. It's sad that the teams don't update their blogs, or do a thing about the spam issue. How about a report/flag button next to users in the comment section? Or maybe some proper spam filtering throughout the site? Or even a way to block users you don't want to see dropping comments on your Space? I'm not asking the impossible here.
Networks - Practically every social networking site does have a network users can sign onto, right? From what it seems, Live Spaces bills itself as a social networking site, yet there's no networks to join! What a lie! So how hard is it to create networks for users to join? A region specific network shouldn't be that difficult. Then moving onto education institutions, and then companies. I doubt Microsoft could ever beat Facebook in the way Facebook revolutionized what social networking really meant, but at least having a network shows some attempt. Maybe they can grab some market outside of America, that hasn't been tapped into the Facebook phenomenon yet.
Groups - MSN Groups is fine, for its ability to accept a lot of customization, but Groups would make a great deal and presence on Live Spaces, than off alone in MSN land. Live Groups needs to be just as user customizable enough (so that it's not atrocious like some MSN Groups), and have the usual features like a place to post photo, videos, links, have discussions, share news, etc. If Groups had a nice UI to it, and viewing media posted is a snap, as well as advance discussion threads (with branching replies, spectacular comment tools, and the works) Groups could be something.
Classified ads - As soon as a regional network starts up, then it would be much more simpler to post a classified ad in the local area. If you want to succeed in making something successful, then give the listed posting a nice clean interface, user ratings on people, ability to post up some decent pictures or videos, IM/Send-A-Message/Call buttons, Live Map of the location specified, Enough characters to type up a good listing, etc. Make it nice looking, and you're set. All for free.
Personals & Dating - Yet another community feature. Take MSN's Match.com, add a new WinLive look, open to teenagers (contained separately), better searching, better layout, and make it FREE. Most online services put some stupid price for monthly subscriptions and that nonsense, while I just want to see who's available in my area based on my criteria. Ads are a better way of monetizing than some ridiculous subscription fees. I'd love to see a new social networking site cater to youths looking for dates, instead of eSPIN.
Retaining user privacy - One of my contacts Marge has an issue with retaining privacy on Space. Live Spaces has this community feature called "What's Your Story" that features 4 Spaces of particular interest. Marge never gave permission to be spotlighted on Spaces. She claims that she got a lot of "friend" invites from many users, who probably aren't even looking to be actual friends. She found this filling up her inbox very annoying, and says that spam came out more than usual. Live Spaces needs to contact users to receive permission to display their Space to the world. She also does not appreciate the "Print" option on top of every blog post. She loves to write poems and short stories, and doesn't want anyone to just go print off her work and do whatever with it. There should be an option to have more limiting functions on visitors.
Status Message - Is it that difficult to display my status message on Spaces? Live Messenger has this feature where you can type a quick status message on how you're doing. Just like a Twitter feed (though Messenger had this for a long time). Practically every social/community page has some type of status message display, that users can display, except Live Spaces. I'd love to see a status message display, that'd also synced with Live Messenger.
Easier page customizing - Moving around modules in Live Spaces, can be difficult and not friendly. On Facebook, it's super simple to drag the top of an application and move it around swiftly to where you might want it, and get a good preview at the way it will finally look. Netvibes also does it the same way, with the same nice dashed lines to indicate the space taken by the module. How does Live Spaces currently do it? You go to this option where you are presented with "module arrangement" and there are top, bottom, and the middle pane (with middle pane divided into 3 more pieces. You CAN'T drag-n'-drop these. Instead, there are these boring 4 buttons that say left, up, down, right. Cruddy.
Messenger IM Control/Presence - How about putting a little Messenger icon next to a user's name to determine if they're online or offline? Your friends can see you, but I don't mind showing everybody that I'm available, as long as they don't get my e-mail address. LiveSide does what exactly I'm talking about.
Better widgets - Or Spaces gadgets as it is called. "Most" gadgets are rather boring, and there's not enough good gadgets out there. Most of them look crappy, and also act crappy. That's just the best way to say it. How come Microsoft isn't creating more gadgets? Why is it up to the developers, if there is any that wants to develop for Live Spaces? Microsoft needs to create incentives to get developers to build great apps. Maybe a contest to win a grand prize? A better API to work with? Make Live Spaces get more users? Facebook gets tons of quality ones because there's many users, and the ability to make social apps. MySpace is already getting lots of apps. Why not Live Spaces?
MyShelf - A personal feature that I made up. I would love an application where I can show a virtual shelf of my music, books, and movies I'm into. High quality cover art thumbnails of my favorite music, books, and movies line up my virtual shelves. When you hover over a thumbnail, you get the title, my personal overview of the item, as well as a link to buy the item at Zune Marketplace. Great idea, eh?
Flash/Silverlight player, not WMP - WMP is awful on the web. It doesn't load up as fast, keeps stalling as it loads, and the player's button configuration is awful. It's better to make a nice looking Flash/Silverlight player, then the crud that is WMP on the web.
Better browser support - Live Spaces runs well enough in IE "most" of the times, but Safari, Opera, and other browsers don't get the same treatment. Mostly, it's the same experience in IE, but the photo slideshows aren't as good, dropping a comment is buggy, and a few other quirks. It doesn't even work that great in IE7 sometimes. I don't know what, but Live Spaces needs to work better with other browsers, and load up faster.
Less page switching - I hate it when Live Spaces has to reload to go to another page. Live Spaces itself is sluggish enough, but to do quick fixes like deleting a comment, edit a caption, adding a comment, moving around modules, etc. shouldn't require a lot of page loading to do. Has the Live Spaces team ever heard of AJAX? They should, since Microsoft started it off a long time ago. I don't know how much AJAXing is done on Live Spaces, but there certainly isn't enough to do quick changes without reloading the page. Use AJAX better so there is less need to reload the page as much.
Chatrooms - Chatrooms are a great way to meet new people, and talk about interests you share. Live Spaces could bring back MSN Chat with a new sleek look, more categories, more input tools, and make chatrooms more flexible and appealing.
Better photo sharing - I want photo-sharing to be something Flickr-like (if MS doesn't buy Yahoo!) experience. All the AJAX goodness like on-the-fly editing, tagging, ability to search for public photos, offer several photo sizes to download, better commenting, fancy slideshows as well as Photosynthing, cooler ways to display photos on Spaces (like separate snapshots, frames, cool slideshow transistions, etc.), simple photo-editing tools (on the page), and anything else that might appeal to a photo-lover.
Video-sharing - There's MSN Soapbox, which is a separate site. I'm thinking that MSN Soapbox could move over to Live Spaces, get a brand new WinLive-esque UI, give every good feature there is possible, and bam. You've got a brilliant video-sharing site that could rival the likes of YouTube. If all the other reasons on this list ever get done.
Easier friend managing - I love how you can manage friends on Wallop. Each friend shows up as a circular icon, and you can drag them around in a virtual space. You can make a cluster, separate individually, put someone you like closer to your own icon, toss people out of the boundary, have people you might be interested lining just outside the boundary, and so on. It's awesome. I'd like something similar (if not the same), and an easy way to write a personal quick overview, tag them, view their contact card, brief profile, status, and an easier way of searching through/for your friends.
More themes, layout choices, more customization features - As the web grows and grows, it's only time until the need for more customization grows. MySpace is very popular for supporting lots of fancy codes (to a fault), while Facebook leans towards little is better. An easy way to change the color/shading/font/size/transparency/effect to a module, without needing to reload the page is good. Having more than 3 columns, a big or paned background image, ways to create unique themes, tons of gadgets, and all the works. The more the customizability, the better.
Better "Guestbook" - Guestbook is another decent enough feature. I just wish it could have some of the neat features of The Wall and Super Wall in Facebook. Things to include such as : Graffiti (doodled art), Photos, Videos, Music, Share Link (like Facebook's that bring up description and current pictures on site), Record Video (from webcam), etc.
Make a better Lists app. - The current List-making app. is fine enough, but there are parts I do not particularly like. Reordering items on a List is very cumbersome. Instead of dropping a number of the position I want in a box next to the listing, how about simply drag-n-drop items in the position you want? Is it that difficult Microsoft? It's not rocket science here if other sites can do it. It's a no-brainer. The ability to copy and paste pictures next to items, would be more easier for me, than hunting down image URLs.
Games - More on the casual gaming side, and the ability to play with you're online friends live. I'm thinking this is yet another MSN property that could switch it's roots over to WinLive. Give MSN Games a new WinLive look, bring interactive social games to play with friends, and keep the game rental service. Gaming as a social networking feature would be awesome.
Download Store - A direct download store on Live Spaces offering things like customized themes, applications, virtual pet supplies, display pics, etc. NO need to hang out on Windows Live Gallery to search for a simple thing on on Live Spaces.
MyWorld - A virtual online world. Every user can make their own avatar, has a provided pad which they can customize with stuff, and the ability to walk around in an open world environment where users can create up to a certain point. MyWorld can be available on a web browser, desktop, or even the Xbox. Certain things can have a price like accessories, dwelling upgrades, etc. It'd be wonderful if there could be realistic high-quality graphics, easy chatting, nicely customizable environments, lots of choices, and easy to use. Virtual worlds are the next big thing.
Public Events - There should be a page showing upcoming public events that are being hosted. The page could contain upcoming events, which can have an overview, location info., Live Map of the area, picture/video, any important links, add to calendar (Live, iCal, whatever), and maybe the ability for users to say that they're attending. This could be an extension of Live Local (formerly MSN City Guides). Live Spaces Events (the current one) is rather weak to me, and won't attract much but a few girly-girls who like frills, or maybe a guy that might try it just once and never again.

So I'm thinking that Live Spaces could become the next MEGA community/social-networking site, if all 25 things were accomplished. Or at least the big ones. 5/25 are actually a redone MSN site that belonged in a community/social environment, and another 5/25 is bringing in existing/dead Live services into the community/social mix. Some of the other stuff is rather wishful thinking, that I'd love to see become a reality, though the chances aren't that high.

I hope the Live Spaces team will consider some of these ideas.

Windows Mobile site gets a new site design

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:23:58 GMT

It appears that the Windows Mobile site recently received a design fix-up.

I have to say, it's MUCH better than the old site. The old site was horrendous to navigate, and appeared to not have been updated since pre-2003. Overall, it's much better to go through, except for some things like:

There are ads - Ads that are completely NOT related to WinMo at all. A product site should NOT have ads at all, unless it has something to do with the products. I do not think that a "Visio Toolbox" ad, fits in at all on WinMo site. Isn't there enough advertising in the world? A product site shouldn't have that. It's a bit of a distraction, and I don't feel happy seeing Microsoft post some ads, on a product site. It's just not right, and pretty unprofessional.

"Windows Mobile Catalog" is a weak attempt at a store - One of the best things about WinMo, is the freedom to make applications or software for WinMo (without the restrictions that another company takes). What's missing though, is a central place (or store) to find & download apps for a WinMo phone. However, "Windows Mobile Catalog" is a very weak attempt in my opinion. First, it's a pretty hard to find (hidden in a link on the "Meet Windows Mobile" page near the bottom). Second, you can't buy or download directly from the site. Instead, 3rd party sites like Handango and MobiHand must do it, which is not as convenient. Third, most apps. (if not all) are NOT free. Forth, users cannot submit applications to the site. Fifth, each application page does not have handy features like (several) screenshots, videos, ratings, reviews, and other typical goodies. It'd also be nice if the store could be a part of WinMo, instead of a separate site, with an ugly mobile interface.

NO Test drive - Have you guys never heard of virtual emulation test drives? Like where you can sort of play with the actual WinMo UI, and explore how it works and all that, on a website? It's like getting to experience the real WinMo, without a real phone.

Little focus on multimedia and internet - When it comes to electronic gadgets, what do typical consumers like? Two things : Multimedia and internet. On the site, there's little focus on the multimedia side and the internet. Actually, in general, the multimedia and internet offerings on WinMo are rather pathetic. I think Microsoft knows this, right? PIE in general does a simple enough job, but it's NOT enough. WMP 10 with a WMP 11 skins, is NOT enough. I'd like to see how the site can show that the browser and multimedia capabilities, are much better than that of other mobile browsers and other phones. Which I doubt is possible.

The site's pretty good though. I hope other Microsoft sites get a fix-up. I don't know how difficult it is to give a site a better look, but it seems to take Microsoft forever with all their product sites.

Safari 3.0 review

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 05:15:36 GMT

I've been using Safari 3.0 for awhile, and it's actually pretty good. Better than I expected. I can't help but remember the buggy catastrophe the first time Safari was available for Windows users, but the latest one isn't that bad.

I did has some issues the first time with downloading it. So I gave up for 3 weeks, and tried it again. It finally worked. So I'm going to point out what I like, and what I don't like. Here's what I like:

Simple and clean UI - I've commended IE7 for keeping a nice streamlined interface, but Safari is just as good. You have the menu bar, then the address and search bar with the back/forward-refresh-add buttons right under it, and then a bookmark bar. The bars fit in tightly with each other, to maximize website screen size. There's also no bottom bar at the very bottom. Pretty good.
Extendable search/address box - Pretty handy. You can either stretch the search box to be bigger, or the address bar to be bigger.
SnapBack - There's this neat orange button at the end of the address bar ( ). This button takes you back to the previous website, without having to rummage around the list of pages in the back button. Like say you're on a cooking website, and a link takes you to Amazon.com. Well you search for some more stuff on Amazon, and realize you want to go back to the cooking site. Instead of scanning the last viewed pages on the back button, you can just press the handy orange SnapBack button. Pretty neat, eh?
Bookmarks Manager - One of my favorite features. Pressing on the bookmarks icon ( ), it takes you to a nice clean page, listing everything from items on the Bookmarks Bar, All Bookmarks, History, and RSS feeds. As well as imported IE favorites. It's much easier to organize and manage saved items, and a nice RSS feeder. I love how there's a slider bar to show how much of each feed you want to see, and you can select what timeframe you want to see the posts from.
History - You can search pages that you viewed, and deleting history is as easy as 2 clicks. On IE, the minimum is 4 clicks. You also can dynamically search through history, where as in IE, you have to click search, to actually search it (though it's quick too).
Loading bar - The loading bar on Safari, is simply just the address bar. It shines blue from the left of the address bar, all the way towards the right of the bar as soon as it's done loading. Another streamlined feature I like. Though the Origami Central browser (IE7 in Origami) does it that way too.
Window sizing is smoother - I notice that window resizing in Safari has a more smoother look, in comparison to IE7.
Better scrollbars - One characteristic about XP that I never liked was the ugly scrollbars. They're so grayed out, that a person with quick eyes can have trouble pinpointing where the scroll bar is, when the slider bar is whitish-gray, and sometime the page is white or close to gray. It annoys the heck out of me, especially in IE7. I don't much like Safari's bright, glossy blue scroolbars that much better, but it's definitely easier on the eyes.
Download Manager - what every modern browser should have. Though I personally don't use it, since I'm not a heavy downloader.
Slim Bookmarks bar - Safari just simply gives the name of one of you bookmarks and that's it. The bar doesn't take up much space, as in comparison to IE8's humongous favorites bar.
Less crashes - I'll be honest. I use IE7 everyday, and I can probably expect at the minimum ONE crash per day. That's just cruddy, and Safari has probably only crashed once or twice in the time I used it.
Better options menu - The options menu in IE7 is VERY cluttered. I don't think I need to view most of them, and it's horrendous to rummage through.
Appearance - Apple's always known for making thing at least look better. Safari is no different. I love Safari's font smoothing. Makes webpages look much better. I also love how when you highlight, the color is blue, rather than IE's tradition of complete contrast highlighting. Blue is more easier on the eyes, and stands out pretty well.
Input box edges highlighted - When you type into any input box (whether to fill in your username & password, a comment, or whatever), the box's edges are highlighted to it's easy to draw your eyes to that portion of your screen. Nice touch. Safari is a great browser if your eyes are kinda poor.
Great webpage search box - It is hard to find, but it functions pretty well. Go to Edit > Find > Find... and there's a nice webpage search box that shows up. Start typing in a few words, and the screen darkens and highlights possible matches. When it narrows it down to one, it highlights the text in bright yellow with the text in black. Very nice touch!

What I don't like :

Only 2 web search options - You can only search Google or Yahoo!. There's no other official way to get Live, Ask, or any other custom search engine. That's my main reason why I don't use Safari as much, I want choices. I search a variety of search engines, and no other options is really sucky.
Bookmarks folder option is hidden - I didn't notice that puny "+" button at the bottom of the Bookmarks Manager. Pretty sneaky
Hidden zooming options - I like how on other browser, it's easy to find the page zoom controls, and make the page bigger or smaller. You have to go into the menu bar to to View, and select either bigger or smaller. Whatever.
No easy access to tabs - Despite Safari's choice of keeping the browser's interface super streamlined, I don't like going through a bunch of menus to find a function I want. Maybe OS X users love to do that (OS X has a default system wide menu bar), but I hate it. I like to see my options all out in front of me, or at least some of the least used things hidden away for later. I have to go to File and New Tab to get a new tab. Same issue with finding the darn zoom controls.
No quick way to view all tabs or preview - I love how IE7 has QuickTabs to view all tabs at once with a mini-screenshot of all tabs, and Opera lets you hover over tabs to get a preview image. Safari has no such thing. It's all text.
Lack of add-ons - Apple has no official place to find Safari add-ons (not surprising considering Apple's stance on 3rd parties and developers). Too bad. That's another downer.
Some sites don't work well - Not a surprise, considering Safari is still new. Though Safari does support a lot of standards, I guess.
Backward buttons and not being consistent with Windows - Hey Apple, this isn't OS X. OK? So please be consistent with the Windows UI for Safari. Like for instance when I try to close Safari with a couple of tabs being used, and Safari wants to check if I'm OK with this, the cancel button is first, and the close button is second. For a normal Windows user, the selection you're most likely to pick first, actually comes first, and cancel or quit is the last option. I don't know how many times I made this mistake with Safari.
Lack of skins - I'm no big fan of Safari's default gray look. It's just so cold. It's suppose to have that brushed metal look like Safari for OS X, but it's just all gray. Kinda ugly in a sense.

Overall, Safari is nice. Much better than expected. Here's some screenshots of interesting stuff:

MSN Radio is dead, and Live Maps with slightly new search box

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:53:12 GMT

So MSN Radio died. Here's the message I got:

Too bad. I actually preferred MSN Radio's sleek black look, compared to Pandora's "slightly different look". I loved listening to Pandora on MSN Radio. Pandora's site has this really ugly Spartan look. When will they make a WMP 11 add-on? Oh well.

Live Search Maps also got a slightly revamped search box to make it more consistent with the latest Live Search UI. Here it is:

Not too bad. The search box is bigger, so it's more easier to type in words. Though I can't help but feel the top portion is slightly larger than it was previously, which in turn means less map view.

Personally, I think the big white space, between the search box area and the map view area, is a waste of space. It does display words relating to the search query, but I think the UI could shorten up a bit? Like this:

Do you think the Live Maps UI looks better this way? Being more compact, and giving a bigger map view would be great to me.

25 Ways Microsoft can fix up their Windows Live/Live Search/MSN online divisions

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:07:13 GMT

Boy is Windows Live+Live Search+MSN all messed up. Lots of users who still somewhat use any of these divisions all have lots of complaints. Despite some nice stuff coming from Windows Live and Live Search, there's a whole lot missing and unfixed. I'm going to address all these main issues right here. So be prepared for a long read.

(a very crudely drawn and photographed WinLive logo)

Here's all the main problems I think that are wrong with the way Microsoft has it set-up. I'm going to identify the problem, explain it, and I will bold what solution I think is best. So her it goes:

Kill off the very weak parts - On MSN, there's a lot of weak properties that need to go. The worst performing ones I'd have to say are : City Guides (NOT helpful), Shopping (worst internet shopping site ever), and Tech & Gadgets (basically content straight from CNET, PC World, among others). They're just a waste and need to die. Others just need to disappear.
Combine the Windows Live, Live Search, and MSN divisions - A biggie. I think it's just too redundant to have 3 separate divisions like this. Windows Live and Live Search confuse most people, because the "Live" term is in both and is confusing across Microsoft (ex: Xbox LIVE, Office Live, etc.). It's just best to put these separated divisions all into one unified place. Again, they'll need to drop the worst stuff, combine some of the best stuff, make one name, and keep an almost uniform look. I've drawn a few of my own screenshot renderings before, and if I can do it, why can't Microsoft?
New name brand for the combo - The best I can come up with would be: WinLive. Does it sound catchy? WinLive doesn't sound too bad compared to Google it. Or maybe WinWeb, Live, or something completely made-up (like the way Zune was brought up). Just DO NOT : use the whole word Windows, be more than 2 syllables, sound so corporate (make a trademark if you want, but don't hideously drop it in a logo), and be too easy to make fun of. I'd be certain that the name brand would be much better if done this way. I'm going to be using the term WinLive for the rest of this blog, to reference the new naming.
Brand new look - Is it too much to ask to make a nice look? Personally, I like the look Live Search has right now, but the way MSN and Windows Live properties look (esp. MSN) is going nowhere. Try making something sleek. Something daring. Something you'd never expect a service+search engine+content combination to look like. Make it smooth and fluid to navigate and browse. All in all, just make it really nice and impressive looking to help make a statement that MS actually has something good. Oh, and no stupid marketing campaigns with dumb shots of smiling people with those goofy grins on their face staring at a computer screen. I want to see how the service/product works, how it would really benefit me, and what's really unique about it.
Brand new logo - The Windows Live Orb, the MSN butterfly thing, and the Live Search icon, need to be replace with something to represent them all. What I was thinking of was something that was somewhat familiar to the Windows OS logo, yet different, like how the Microsoft Office logo is like. As you can see from the crudely drawn (and photographed!) picture at the top, that's what I had in mind. 4 pieces of the puzzle (search, services, communications, and software) all being a core experience of WinLive. At least if drawn expertly, would look much better than a Windows logo in a shiny orb.
Rename properties - Even though MS has gone past their super long product naming habits in the past, the names of many of their internet properties are rather sucky. I'd suggest that; Windows Live Hotmail goes to WinLive E-mail (that way WinLive Mail can remain the desktop version), Live Messenger goes to WinLive IM, Windows Live Photo Gallery to WinLive PhotoFix, Windows Live Movie Maker to WinLive MovieFix. Etc. Just simplify it up some more, and avoid super long names. Naming is VERY important, and if it's too long or just boring sounding, people are less inclined to go for it.
Improve Search Algorithm - Maybe it's time to realize that computer generated results aren't always the best. Live Search isn't awful (far better than Yahoo!) and the UI looks nice, but the results aren't always the best nor will any other search engine always get it right. So how about doing something radical like letting users rank what results they like best, or adding a URL they think should be included, and ranking down or putting a cross out over links that people don't like? Being human powered by a large number of users, it'd be hard to drop a "Google bomb" on it. Wikpedia has their own Wikia search, and it's user-powered. From what I've seen, this could be the next big thing. I've done a few searches, and they're pretty darn relevant (along with ad-less and no page flipping). User-powered search is something MS should consider. To make sure though, a few selected users could be chosen to fix up how the results on a certain query are, and everybody else can pick if the results were right or not. If 75%+ majority agree, then it's settled. If not, it can get reworked. People in the know, can edit on the fly if something major happens like a new site, service, etc.
Making more quality RIA (Rich Internet Applications) - Technically, MS does have some RIA from their online division. Such as: Live Writer, Photo Gallery, Mail, Live Mesh, and Messenger. But in a way, they're really BORING. I find the UI to be very crude around the edges on Photo Gallery, and Live Messenger has a lot of uselessness bundled with it. I would love to see an application with an overview of status of all your WinLive service. Think of it was Microsoft Max+Windows Live Home. Something nice looking, functional, and a great part of the service. I also want a better PhotoFix, VideoFix, Virtual Earth (desktop), MS Office Lite, and whatever the Live Labs team can come up with. Things to keep in mind : Takes up as small HD space, Silverlight/WPF based, fast, consistent and neat UI theme with WinLive, and does a lot of functions well. Kudos if there's no ads.
Enhance mobile offerings - Make it easy to access settings on a mobile device. In a way that it works as well as the real desktop offering. It would also be great if MS actually made a better mobile OS and mobile internet browser to access WinLive. So that it's super easy to roam around WinLive on a relatively small screen. Instead of making "mobile versions" of a website, the browser should render pages as they actually are the best it can, and be able to zoom in and out smoothly to view the site. Practically all of WinLive should be available ready to use on a mobile device.
Being platform friendly - It shouldn't be a matter of whether you're trying to sell a service, or selling your other product. It should just be focused on selling the service as well as possible on other platforms. Such as different browsers like Firefox, Safari, and Opera. Or even if it's OS X and Linux. WinLive services should definitely be fully-optimized for any browser, and should at least work good enough on another OS.
Pro/Plus/Premium accounts - What Microsoft needs, is a Pro account for all of WinLive services. Not just Hotmail. I could see Pro account containing at least : Hotmail Plus, 20GB SkyDrive storage, NO ads on any WinLive stuff, Full access to OneCare, etc. Maybe for roughly $65 a year? Or $10 a month? Just make WinLive Pro worth it. Without making free services feel sucky.
ONE Team blog - What annoys me a lot is having to keep up with a bunch off other blogs related to Windows Live or Live Search. Sure, I have RSS feeds on some of them, but it's really a lot of clutter. Some team blogs don't update or rarely ever update their blog (if it's on Live Spaces, there's spam from not being maintained). Honestly, do users need to check up on every single teams' blogs? One blog that's well maintained to get some of the latest news from all of WinLive would be great. Employees can contribute whatever posts (as long as it's useful) about their own team if they want. Just DON'T host it on Live Spaces. Better yet, make http://blog.live.com/ be the official place to get the latest news from the WinLive teams. Of course, employees can still post whatever they want to personally share on MSDN or whatever blogging site, but if all the teams could just post general important news (updates, fixes, new stuff, etc.) in one central location, that would be great.
Better service overview site - Where do users get info. about a Windows Live service? Well there's http://windowslive.com/ or http://get.live.com/ . Both of which are so cheesy and are just really general about what the service do. A WinLive overview site needs to give a nice detailed overview of what each service or product does. No corny "experience" vibe marketing messages or that kind of nonsense, especially describing what any common service does. It'd be best to differentiate how WinLive does it better or has an exclusive great features other services don't have (if any). Nice screenshots, good professional video (without the experience marketing vibe, more product and less people with smiles, and full focus on neat stuff people might like), and maybe an emulator. Reviews wouldn't hurt much either, and a big download button could help. As well as any add-ons or skins and betas, so people don't need to bother searching for these. http://windowslive.com/ or http://winlive.com/ or whatever the new name is called would be a great site to host all the service/search overviews.
Innovate, do something different - Catching up with other web companies is NOT going to help Microsoft at all. Ballmer or whoever needs to get that through their thick skull. If you want to succeed, then go above the bar. Focus on providing a service to a niche market that's been relatively untapped. Change the way we commonly view a service and make it feel new and exciting (also known as revolutionizing). Give features that people request, and give them fast. This is a BIG problem Microsoft has trouble with, and it would great to see them focus on this.
Add more services and search - I'd like to see WinLive delve into more services that I find missing from their offerings like : Chatrooms, Groups, browser-based IM, Polls, Personals, RSS reader, web-hosting, etc. More search verticals like Music (Zune Social?), Blog (Technorati?), Books and Academic (redone), and anything else of interest.
ONE login ID - It seems like anytime you need to sign-in with your Live ID, you don't always get the same page. There's either Microsoft Passport Network or Windows Live ID. Why not just call them both the exact same thing? They ARE exactly the same thing right? Just with different names. Anything that's not Windows Live, such as Xbox, Zune.net, MSN, and a few others use the old style Passport ID. What I don't like about the Passport style is that you can't store multiple login ID's, and it looks cruddy. If MSDN could also utilize the Live ID login, then it would be much easier for people to toss in a nice comment. Having to manage just ONE simple login prompt, is much nicer than looking at a bazillion different ones.
Community/Social Network site - I want to see a stronger community/social networking site from MS, than what Live Spaces is. I would love to see MS create a real nice site where users can post/share photos, blog posts, videos, lists, feeds, files to share, status message, personal widgets, contact info., and other things to on a personal page. As well as community aspects such as Networks, Groups/Forums, Chatrooms, Classifieds, Events (public ones in the area), Dating Personals, and maybe even Polls & Surveys. To sum it up, just create one SUPER community site. Give a nice design layout, ease of access to all community aspects, and easy customizability of users' personal pages. Make it full of quality and design and not be excessively ad-filled like MySpace.
Databases/Indexes - What's the purpose of the Internet? To find information. A search engine is nice, but it's only a tool to find the information. How about MS starts getting into the business of creating databases of information to share with the world? I'm hoping that each entry could have possibility of containing : detailed article, years in existence, pictures, videos, audio, specs & components, company/publisher/organization associated with, trivia/notes, statistics, data in a nice graphical display (charts, graphs, etc.), related tags, maps, amount of [insert whatever], dimensions, weight, any number/ID/classification associated with it (ex: ISBN, genus name, etc.), tables to explain differences with separate versions, timeline of major events associated with it, user ratings, reviews, related tags, related/official links, and anything else there could be associated with an entry. So think of this as somewhat like Wikipedia + official info. site + reviews & rating + multimedia all rolled into one. Though databases will be based on popular subjects such as cars, music, movies, books, organisms, computer & gadgets, companies, or anything like that. It'd be a great all-in-one place to get high level info. pertaining to the specific thing you're looking for. Users have the option to edit the info., but the edit has to get cleared by a specialist running the site. It needs to get verified that it's true and not fake to keep the relevancy and accuracy of the entries to be right. Again, I'm hoping the site is wonderful looking with a good focus on providing wonderful multimedia to accompany the entry. As well as well designed graphs and charts to give a good look at the data, and a timeline with point relating to major events associated with the entry. Think of it as a super encyclopedia database.
Digital money account - MS should also get into making an electronic money service, or Microsoft's own version of PayPal. Just more easier to pay stuff online (if accredited sites accept it) and good to use overseas, in real life checkout (using your WinMo phone?) and use it as real money. Almost like a universal digital credit card. Though hopefully it's super secure.
Microsoft Office Lite - WinLive would be a great place to make a free web & ad-based Office solution. It could be similar to Adobe Buzzword in where you can do both document making AND sharing with contacts who can view/edit/comment. So it's like combining a web-based Office and Office Live Workspaces together. Though hopefully it has the neat UI richness Adobe Buzzword offers, but with more features and make it just as easy to share content with your friends who can view/edit/comment all in real time.
Professional weblogs sites - Professional weblog sites are pretty popular these days. Sites ranging from tech stuff like Ars Technica, Techcrunch, and Lifehacker, to site of other topics like The Consumerist, Treehugger, Autoblog, and Yahoo! Shine among others are quite popular sources to get news with some pizzazz. Professional blogging sites are different from regular news sources in the sense that posts usually have more opinions from the editor, and maybe jokes and Photoshopped photos are thrown in for some humor. Most times professional blogs just like to retell what news sources say, or have their own personal coverage of an event or item they got their hands on. It's more social than the typical news source, and it's fun to read/reply to comments left, you can learn some extra tips, and it's pretty nice. Microsoft should get into that and host some of their own special blogs on topics from food to shopping all the way to music and movies. There should be some good choice of topics, weekly exclusives, have good enough content and coverage to sift through daily, and as much media to accompany the post. It'd be great if Microsoft could specialize into niche topics like popular ongoing book series (ex: Hardy Boys, Harry Potter, Nancy Drew, etc.), law enforcement (tips for cops, rising topics in crime, etc.), geeky science stuff, comic world, medical, art, etc. Special things like tips, weekly podcasts, good video and picture coverage, rumors, previews, etc. Kinda like a magazine, except digital. MS shouldn't make a technology/gadget blog at all though. Consider Microsoft is a company that makes technology and gadgets, it would be hard to avoid being biased no matter what editors you hire to cover tech & gadgets. Not to mention you wouldn't want to tick Gawker Media and Weblogs, Inc., whose top 2 blogs are tech & gadgets oriented : Gizmodo and Engadget. Microsoft wouldn't want to get negative reviews because they're competing with two influential tech & gadget weblogs, right?
Virtual 3D World - I'm not talking about Virtual Earth or Live Maps here. I'm talking about an open-ended virtual world where users can roam around, meet other people, and engage in virtual activities. Kinda like Second Life. This virtual world could also be accessible through Xbox consoles, and rival Sony's upcoming Playstation Home. You can make a realistic 3D avatar and interact with online friends, go around and explore the virtually-created places, and do some activities around. You can own your own home and keep some virtual things in it. The service itself can be free, but there could be advertising somewhere or things like furniture, clothes, bigger homes, could cost a little real money. I'm hoping it's as nice looking as possible with a simplified UI, and that the possibilities of virtual communities can be established very well. I'm thinking it could be called : Virtual World
More faster and efficient - It always seems like it takes forever for an update to come. The Live Maps team seems to consistently update their service every so often, but the other teams are really slow. Especially Hotmail and Messenger, the top two most used out of Windows Live. Not to mention Spaces. How hard is it to add features users want? That's what I never liked about Microsoft : They give one big new version (like a UI change, more features, etc.), but they don't give minor updates during the time period until the next version, unless it's a security issue. So it could be months or years until a new version comes with any features people want. If it's not in this one, you'll have to wait again for the next one. What a bore. I want updates and new features FAST. No need to wait until the next version to give that small update.
Improve minor bits of the experience - Simple things like making sites/software easily keyboard accessible, pretty icons (not BORING icons), fast loading, visual-pleasing aesthetics, nice transitions, less bugs, more activity can be done on current page than on separate pages (less page loading), one login does all, fun stuff (like a completely random service, that's not useful, but a mere little joke), and a bunch of other nifty things.
NO half-baked projects - Don't release half-baked projects as betas. Please don't. Those should be considered alphas. What I mean by half-baked, is that there still tons of bugs, missing promised features, unstable, little team support, and all the signs that a project could fail instantly. There's been betas like Windows Live for TV, Help Community, and Shopping, where there must have been at least a handful of beta testers (or guinea pigs) and I guess the time they took to volunteer and help with the projects meant nothing to Microsoft. They weren't compensated, and any work they did is gone. Half-baked projects like that show how MS doesn't know how to run services or software very well, and doesn't boost confidence in their online offerings. It'd be better to make a solid version first, and then release it as beta.

So that's my super long list of ways that I think could help Microsoft's online services, instead of the current soggy state it's in now. Maybe those teams might stumble upon this post, and might do something about it. I can hope, right? Any comments? Just post them.

Windows Live for TV and MSN WiFi Hotspots are dead

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:57:49 GMT

Man, it seems like I post dying Microsoft properties every day. Well here's two new ones for you : Windows Live for TV and MSN WiFi Hotspots. Both are dead. I didn't think either would survive.

& ARE DEAD

Windows Live for TV looked like it had a sluggish UI and not many people use Spaces to warrant much use on Media Center. There was IMing and Contact Call capabilities but that's about it. I did like the contact card thing though. Maybe one day, they could just make Live IM fro WMC. It's already in Xbox 360.

MSN WiFi Hotspots was ok. Like the name says, it's a tool to help find WiFi places. It worked. But just like almost many MSN sites, it looked so boring. There were many extras, it only just showed WiFi hotspots (free or paid) on a Virtual Earth map. I don't remember, but I think you could register a new WiFi place you discover. The service does conveniently redirect you to Jiwire, a much better WiFi-finding service, that has even better tools to help you find a WiFi place, worldwide data, and does a much better implementation of pinpointing these places on a Virtual Earth map. There seems to also be some ads along with the service. The site is much better looking and easy to use. This is what Microsoft should have done.

It never made sense to drop WiFi Hotspots in the MSN division. A WiFi-finding service belongs on Windows Live, rather than MSN. And Microsoft never really promoted MSN WiFi Hotspots anyway. What a joke.

Anyways, I hope to see more junk cleared away from Microsoft's online division. It's really an embarrassment to the company.

If you look on Wikipedia, Windows Live WiFi Center actually seemed more like a solid service than what MSN WiFi ever was.

MobileMe - Apple's new online service solution ; why it's neat and why it sucks

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:37:20 GMT

I'd be surprised if you didn't hear anything about Apple's WWDC that occurred on Monday. The main news being that there's a 3G iPhone and a service called MobileMe.

MobileMe is Apple's new online service. The way Apple describes it, MobileMe is suppose to help make it easy to access some of your stuff from your desktop (PC or Mac), from a web browser, and from your iPhone. It's not ready yet, but it will be hosted on the me.com site. Based on the screenshots, MobileMe seems to be really pretty and simple.

I must say, even though this is Apple's first attempt at online service, the screenshots really show more of a smooth interface and feel than what Windows Live has ever accomplished. I mean look at Windows Live. It's a mess compared to MobileMe. Some services look completely different, others have quickly died, Live Search uses a different UI theme, MSN has it's own jumble of properties, and a lot of confusion. Apple seems to have their service mostly right with the way MobileMe is set up.

However, I must say that MobileMe is nothing but a blatant overpriced service, that you could already get from Windows Live, Google, and Yahoo! for FREE. Albeit, with advertising and some limitation, but it's free and does exactly the same thing. Case in point:

Storage - Live SkyDrive and AOL Xdrive does 5GB for free.
Mail - The interface looks VERY much like Yahoo! Mail's web interface. (There is Quick Reply though, and it's nice quick way to respond back to an e-mail with just a simple message thread)
Address Book - I already love the way Live Contacts is set-up (same way that Yahoo! copied it)
Calendar - Same as Google Calendar (though I must add it seems like a blast to use and has extra features)
Gallery - Can you say Flickr? Or even Live Spaces's user photo section? (again, I must say that album set-up and viewing are very neat and simple)
iDisk - Sounds a lot like SkyDrive (which does both storage + share)

So is $99 really that justifiable enough to pay for all this you can get for free? There's no advertisements and the services are completely integrated, but Microsoft and Yahoo! (Google mobile is kinda meh) have already offered these services as well as access them on a mobile phone for free. Also, me.com sounds rather self-centric (which isn't surprising considering Apple's target audience).

I say that MobileMe is a rip off. Also, if you'd note, the MobileMe logo has a rather very similar "me" as the one in the Windows ME logo.

Quite a coincidence, no? Too me, MobileMe is just a rip-off. Just a copycat of Microsoft Exchange. Might be great for just a regular loser (I mean user), but not as great as Microsoft Exchange. Maybe the "me" in the logo really stands for Microsoft Exchange. Heh.

Also, take a look between MobileMe's Gallery service compared with Windows Live for TV's picture gallery:

What a copycat! Apple's been really copying lately it seems.

It's just typical Apple gloss and shine with an overpriced fee. I also thought that .Mac at least sounded cooler than MobileMe.

Here's a link to the guided tour if you're interested (need lousy Quicktime and it's almost 10 minutes) : http://www.apple.com/mobileme/guidedtour/

I will admit that Apple does a good job on describing their service in the video, compared to the crappy way MS does it with their Windows Live stuff. Plus the photos are way more appealing and fresh, and the person seems to actually speak well (no noticeable mess-ups). It's really smooth.

Also Apple's Keynotes are always interesting to watch. Why? Because the presentation slides are rich with shiny graphics, to-the-point statements, and smooth demos. Microsoft keynotes are noticeably a bore. Microsoft could take notes on a more engaging keynote.

Hopefully, this will get Microsoft, Yahoo!, and even Google scurrying to deliver better online services. Especially MS.

Windows Live vs. Live Search vs. MSN

Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:01:21 GMT

If some of you didn't already know, these are three separate divisions of Microsoft's online service : Windows Live, Live Search, and MSN. Here's the basic difference:

Windows Live = Services ; Just services, and that's it. Thing like e-mail, IM, file storage, community site, etc.

Live Search = Search ; Just the search engine, and that it. Like Web, Image, News, Video, and other search.

MSN = Content ; Such as articles and topics of interest

Hopefully, that could help explain what each 3 divisions of Microsoft's online division does. Personally, I hope to see the all combined one day into one successful internet destination and service. Hopefully, it won't be sloppily done, but that's just a dream. Anyways, that should explain the difference if you didn't already get it.

CEO Ballmer to reign for another 8-9 years?

Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:35:43 GMT

It looks as if Steve Ballmer might reign as Microsoft's CEO all the way to 2018, if something doesn't disrupt this.

Hopefully, something does. Personally, I don't like Steve Ballmer. I can't say that Microsoft has improved all that much since he's been CEO, nor has it been that bad. But I definitely wouldn't miss Ballmer, if he had to step down. Why?

Bad image for MS - People only hear and discuss Ballmer's nutso-like personality. The pictures of his face with this silly grin, like a sweating ape. Ballmer throwing chairs, and screaming about DEVELOPERS. I'm not all judgmental based on peoples' looks, but I can't feel confident much about Microsoft just looking at Ballmer. He gives the company a bad image.
Onstage presence is poor - Based on prior past appearances (DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS!), Ballmer just isn't a good spokesman for the company. Steve Jobs does a much better natural approach.
Lack of any ingenuity coming from MS - So far, even with some neat stuff still coming from Microsoft, the company's still not compelling enough to people. It's much harder to like Microsoft, than it is to like Apple. Apple products are usually all noted for being nice-looking, functional, and blends well with each other. Microsoft on the other hand has a bunch of products, some bad and some great, but there's a lack of a similar experience with all the products, and MS needs to bring out something new.

So I really hope Microsoft could hire some younger guy, with more passion, with better looks, and evokes a stronger feel for Microsoft. A fresh new CEO, could be a new and better start for the future of Microsoft.

Ballmer staying in for so long, makes me have doubts if Microsoft can pull away from the negativity associated with the company. Even a blog from the CEO would be nice.

From Engadget.

Brand new (online) Microsoft Store

Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:27:53 GMT

Microsoft has opened a brand new Microsoft Store site. From first appearances, the site seems very clean and simple to use. Nice blank canvas showing just the product.

I've got some nice things to say about the Microsoft Store website :

Nice clean design - Far better than I would have expect. None of that crazy, cluttered, over-colored UI at Windows Marketplace. Just simple and to the point. The page is has a clean cut look, and no ads, or any other crazy things to promote it.
Download Option - You can download the Windows OS, Office, and other stuff once you pay for it. No need to buy a CD (there's a choice though), and waste space. Product keys are right on the sight, and all you have to do is just log-in to see them. A download option is very eco-friendly.

Now here's what I don't like about the Microsoft Store site:

UK & Germany only - I know the US always seems to be first to get things, but I don't see why the US can't be supported at the moment. I can still browse the site at least.
Lack of products - You'd think Microsoft would try offering more of their products. "Home+Money" section has no Money products, and "Design+Developer" don't even have any developing tools. Plus Encarta, OneCare, and other software programs? Along with hardware items like Xbox 360, Zunes, keyboards, webcams, mice, etc. Why aren't they on here too?
No ratings/reviews/screenshots/video demos, etc. - Come on. None of that? It wouldn't hurt, right? Maybe MS (or any company selling their own stuff on their site) could stand the criticism of any product, but no screenshots or video demos to share instantly? It shouldn't be that hard.
Prices - I've complained about prices before, but making it affordable and not too outright expensive will make buying a viable choice from piracy. I'd say an OS shouldn't cost more than $250 a piece, and most Office programs should go between $20-$40.

Aside from that, I'd love to see a Microsoft (retail) store coming soon. Would be a great place to showcase current products and other upcoming goodies. I can't go more into that, but I'd say it be a fantastic idea to open up flagship stores around the nation.

James Senior has some pretty good info. about the site.

Live Expo is joining the list of failed Windows Live services

Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:33:57 GMT

Another day, another service to be phased out. Seems like Windows Live Expo is going to be coming to an end.

Right now the site claims Expo is ending service July 31, 2008. The message always claims that you CAN'T:

Create a new account
Post a new listing
Extend a listing
Upgrade a listing to a premium listing

So pretty much, all you can do is maintain whatever is left of the postings you put up, and delete them or respond back to anybody that was interested. Then it all goes down the drain.

I didn't think it would take long. My thoughts on Live Expo is that the service is really cruddy, didn't offer much over Craigslist (well at least more direct pictures), stupid name (seriously, who not simply call it "Classifieds"?), outdated UI (Live Wave 2?), among other stupid things. Releasing mediocre services like this is not going to make people use Windows Live at all.

Heck, the Expo team can't even manage their blog (like many other teams btw), and haven't updated in eons. And the comment sections are piling with spam (if you can't manage the blog, at least close the comment section. Too lazy for that?). The Expo team is such a disappointment.

So good riddance. Maybe one day when the Live team gets their stuff right, we might see a really great classified service from them. However, after seeing the lazy Expo team (if they still exist) and their work, I don't really count on it.

I wonder what this could mean for Windows Live Favorites. That site too hasn't been updated to the Live Wave 2 UI. So will that go kaput? I don't really actually use Live Favorites, but I could one day if I might need to access some of my faves on a computer that isn't mine. So that would be a unique service worth keeping. If only that could just simply update it.

Maybe the WL teams can get their act together and do a better job instead of closing down services. Shows how weak they are.

5 Absolutely annoying aspects of Live Spaces

Wed, 28 May 2008 08:11:03 GMT

Live Spaces is fine enough, but there's many annoying issues I've been hoping the Spaces team would resolve for a long time. Here they are:

1. Usage of the "Communicate Preference Settings" - For some reason, even if a person does not enable other people to communicate with him or herself, that person can communicate with ANYONE. So when a person like I tries to respond back to a message, I get this:

What a joke! So this guy can communicate with me whenever he feels like it, but I can't respond back? So why should this guy enable one-way communication with people, but won't allow other people to respond?

My fix : People can only send messages if they too can receive messages from other people.

2. Spam - It's practically everywhere on Live Spaces. Usually by some Chinese guys. It's annoying have to go to edit mode of a blog post just to get rid of it, but it's also annoying that you can't easily report these spammers with stupid links to nowhere. Some Spaces users (looking directly at the people that run Live team blogs) don't even get rid of the spam. It just sits there forever piling up the comment section and looks atrocious. Image below is taken from an entry of the OneCare Safety Scanner blog.

My fix : Enable a report/block button next to users names in the comment section, and have someone maintain this.

3. Usage of Categories and NOT Tags - Should it be that hard to be able to search for blog entries with a quick tag? Tags do a much better job of labeling contents of a blog post, then categorizing them under just one group. There's also a limit of 25 categories you can make. So this is very convenient, and a tagging solution might be way more helpful. For that reason, I don't use Categories.

My fix : Drop the Categories, Enable tagging. Welcome to Web 2.0

4. "Sorry, you can't view this space" - Even if I'm considered one of your "friends"? I have several "friends" whose Spaces I can't view for some reason. I have to write an explanation why, like in this screen snapshot:

It's not as I added this person. This person added me, yet I can't view this person's Space. What a joke.

5. Lots of clicking and page reloads - Live Spaces loves to reload a page when you do something as simple as adding a comment, or deleting comments, editing just one module, among other tasks. How hard is it to code the site to easily make changes to something without having to reload the page and wait? I shouldn't have to navigate around a lot to do something oh-so simple with so many clicks. A simple task does not need to reload the page 7 times to get it done. What a hassle.

Overall. those are the main quirks I have with Live Spaces. Hopefully someone will listen and fix these problems.

No Space. No Profile Picture. No Communication. No being Friends with me.

Tue, 27 May 2008 07:44:05 GMT

This is something personal I want to issue. And this might not apply to everyone. But if your one of my "friends" that I've added, I ask that you either have a real Live Space I can look at, a simple profile picture, and have commented or communicated with me sometime.

I honestly do not want a list of "friends" that have none of these. Your more like a ghost or invisible person if you don't have these. I don't know why you would want to be friends with me, if I can't even try with you. It's really creepy, and I'm already starting to crack down on the friend issue.

So if you're my friend on Live Space, prove it by doing something. I will DEFINITELY get rid of people right off the bat that have none of these things. And I might toss out more if they lack too much. So this is a warning.

Comment more often and that will also score you some brownie points. So this is just a warning post.